Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Corbett

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1955No. Civ. 20412PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to appellant’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. The first cause of action seeks a rescission of written agreements for the exchange of certain real and personal properties of appellants in Santa Barbara, for real and personal properties of respondents Wil liam and Gertrude Corbett, in the state of Washington, based on alleged failure of consideration. Another count sought rescission on the ground of fraud.

Appellants’ original complaint in this action set up the fact that on February 8, 1952, appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Slavin v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Redwood Investment Co. v. ExleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Guilloz v. ParkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Norton v. House of Mercy of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Johnson v. Hydraulic Research & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Marriage of KowalewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API