Legal Opinion

Guilloz v. Parkinson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff is the daughter and the defendant is the sister of Charles A. Parkinson, who died testate on April 7, 1921, in the county of Los Angeles. The will of the decedent, bearing date March 18, 1921, was admitted to probate on the ninth day of the following May. The decedent left as heirs at law his widow, who resided in Michigan, two sons and the plaintiff. The will acknowledged the marital relationship of the testator, made certain bequests to his children and designated the defendant herein as the residuary legatee and devisee. Certain real estate located in Fresno, Hollywood, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Estate of ParkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Guilloz v. National Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. United States ex rel. First Continental National Bank & Trust Co. v. Western Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Lockley v. LockleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Parkinson v. GuillozMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API