Legal Opinion
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1995No. CX-94-2106Published
1Opinion of the Court
531 N.W.2d 891 (1995)
Robert HASNUDEEN and Tracy Hines, Appellants,
v.
ONAN CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. CX-94-2106.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
May 23, 1995.
Review Granted July 20, 1995.
Richard A. Beens, Brad J. Miller, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.
John M. Anderson, Mark R. Whitmore, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and RANDALL and MANSUR,[*] JJ.
OPINION
MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.
Appellants brought this suit alleging that respondent violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.