Legal Opinion
Harley v. Paschall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 16078PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he is the owner of a leasehold estate and is entitled to immediate possession of certain lands, consisting of 100 acres in Stephens county, under a written lease made by J. B. Springs, guardian of Winter Kelley Springs. Two leases are set up in the petition and amended petition; one lease being dated May 8, 1920, and being for a period of one'year, and one dated June 23, 1921, and ending June 23. 1922. That he paid the sums of $75 per year for each lease period,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Kali Inla Coal Co. v. GhinelliSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lamb v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Beggs Oil Co. v. DeardorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nichols v. CallawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Simmons v. FarissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Whiteneck Bassett v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Bardwell v. Riverside Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929