Legal Opinion

Whiteneck Bassett v. Weaver

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1929No. 18349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

John G. Weaver, defendant in error, was plaintiff below, and plaintiff in error was defendant below. The parties will be referred to herein as in the trial court.

Plaintiff sues defendant for damages for breach of an alleged contract for the sale of 100 bales of cotton. The contract was alleged to be oral and entered into November 3, 1925, wherein defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, and plaintiff agreed to buy from defendant, 50 bales of cotton then located in public gin yard at Butler, Okla., and 50 bales of cotton located in public gin yard at Leedy, Okla., to be delivered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Swafford v. SprattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Forry v. BrophySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Tidal Refining Co. v. Charles E. Knox Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burson v. Whistler's, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. People v. RatnerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1944
  3. Abel v. BachmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API