Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment which invalidated Multnomah County Ordinance No. 367 and enjoined defendant from enforcing the ordinance against plaintiffs. We affirm.
The ordinance, enacted by defendant in February, 1983, provides for the imposition of permit fees for construction within the right-of-way alongside county roads. Plaintiffs, Oregon utilities, use rights-of-way to provide customer service and challenge the validity of the ordinance. The trial court concluded that the ordinance violates ORS 758.010 and is therefore invalid. We agree.
ORS 758.010(1) provides, in pertinent part:
“*…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Schmidt v. MastersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Water Resources Dept. v. City of Klamath FallsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Buchanan v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Buchanan v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994