Water Resources Dept. v. City of Klamath Falls
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
The State of Oregon, on behalf of the Water Resources Department, brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that the City of Klamath Falls’ Ordinance No. 6343 is invalid, because the state has preempted the field of regulation of ground water use. The trial court granted defendant-intervenor’s motion for summary judgment on the preemption claim and denied the state’s cross-motion. The state appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants. We affirm.
Ordinance No. 6343 was adopted by the citizens of Klamath Falls through the initiative process on June 30,1981, and makes it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Envirosafe Services of Idaho, Inc. v. County of OwyheeIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000