Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 4, 1986No. A8306-04179; CA A32883Published
1Opinion of the Court
720 P.2d 1285 (1986)
79 Or.App. 722
Dennis BUCHANAN, in his capacity as County Executive, and Multnomah County, a home rule political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondents-Cross-Appellants,
v.
Daniel E. WOOD, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
A8306-04179; CA A32883.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted May 24, 1985.
Decided June 4, 1986.
Susan E. Watts, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs were Jack L. Kennedy and Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland.
John B. Leahy, County Counsel, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.