Legal Opinion

United Taxpayers Co. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1921No. Civ. No. 3931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. Modified. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, United Taxpayers Company, as the assignee of seven different taxpayers to recover back from the city and county of San Francisco certain taxes for the fiscal year 1907-08 alleged to have been paid under protest pursuant to the provisions of section 3819 of the Political Code. The aggregate sum which the plaintiff thus sought to recover as stated in the prayer of its complaint was $4,777.26, with interest thereon from the seventeenth day of January, 1908, together with costs.

The answer of the defendant was so framed as to put in issue most of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Columbia Savings Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Delger v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State of California v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API