Columbia Savings Bank v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, James C. Rives, District Attorney, and Curtis D. Wilbur, Chief Deputy, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to recover from defendant certain taxes paid under protest, pursuant to the provisions of section 3819 of the Political Code. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll, which contains a bill of exceptions setting out the evidence..
About the middle of February, 1899, plaintiff bought United States interest-bearing bonds of the value of $59,206, and afterwards, about April 21, 1899, sold the same at a profit. In due time the plaintiff made and returned to the assessor what purported to be a statement of all the taxable property owned by it on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Whittaker v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Henne v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- MacKay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Engebretson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.