Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward Rose & Sons, Dorchen/martin Associates, Incorporated Eckert/wordell Architects, Pc Gerald Peterson James R. Saule
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2004No. 03-1316/1418PublishedCited by 163 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
This housing discrimination case turns on what doors must be accessible to the handicapped. At issue are two sets of apartment complexes, designed with an inaccessible front door, but an accessible back patio door. The district court granted the U.S. Justice Department (“government”) a preliminary injunction halting the construction and occupancy of the buildings. The main defendant, the builder and owner, Edward Rose & Sons (“Rose”), appeals, arguing that court erred (1) by misconstruing the requirements of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (“FHA”),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Washington v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- Tree of Life Christian Sch. v. City of Upper Arlington, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- American Council of the Blind v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Smith Wholesale Co. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Bob TaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.