Legal Opinion
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 30, 2007No. 05-1345PublishedCited by 320 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
“Flow control” ordinances require trash haulers to deliver solid waste to a particular waste processing facility. In C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Clarkstown, 511 U. S. 383 (1994), this Court struck down under the Commerce Clause a flow control ordinance that forced haulers to deliver waste to a particular private processing facility. In this case, we face flow control ordinances quite similar to the one invalidated in Carbone. The only salient difference is that the laws at issue here require haulers to bring waste to facilities owned and operated by a state-created public benefit corporation. We…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by320 opinions
- McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Selevan v. New York Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. v. Sidamon-EristoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.