Coral Gables, Inc. v. Heim

A statement of the facts of this case ap' pears in the opinion of the Supreme Court, 120 Coran. 419, and the record on appeal, A — 7?—373. The execution of the note and the amount of the unpaid balance are admitted. The plaintiff admits that it is not a holder in due course unless it has acquired that status by assignment from a holder in due course. The most important issue was whether or not the Biscayne Trust Company, first indorsee, had notice that the conditions of the contract to secure which the note was given had been breached when it took the paper. A great deal of testimony, by…