Legal Opinion
Baker v. Pfeifer
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 20, 1996No. C2-94-099PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 82, 83, and 84). The parties appeared for oral argument on May 9, 1996. Having considered the arguments and the law in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motions.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Harold D. Baker, Emile C. Ott and M. Curtiss McKee are Mississippi residents who invested in oil and gas wells in Ohio. The Complaint names the following individuals and entities as defendants: Tiger Oil, Inc., J & P Oil, J & P Salvage, Mid-Ohio…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scott v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stephenson v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Krear v. MalekDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Rowe v. Marietta Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.