Legal Opinion

Wooldridge v. Woolett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1981No. 47840-6PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This case presents the question whether the value of a person's shortened life expectancy is a separately recoverable item of damages in a survival action brought pursuant to RCW 4.20.046. The trial court refused to instruct the jury that the reasonable value of Clifford S. Wooldridge's shortened life expectancy was a separate element of damages in this survival action. The Court of Appeals, Division Two, affirmed the trial court in all respects. Wooldridge v. Woolett, 28 Wn. App. 869, 626 P.2d 1007 (1981). We likewise affirm.

The facts are as follows:

Clifford S. Wooldridge, Scott Allen…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. James v. RobeckWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Willinger v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Lundgren v. Whitney's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. McGee v. AC AND S, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API