Legal Opinion

Harn v. Interstate Building & Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1918No. 9281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Suit by W. P. Harn and wife against the Interstate Building & Loan Company and another. Prom a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs’ evidence on their first cause of action, and awarding nominal damages only on their second cause of action, they bring ei-ror.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the evidence of the plaintiffs on their first cause of action, and in awarding judgment for nominal damages only on their second cause of action, in a suit instituted by Mr. and Mrs. W. P. Harn, as plaintiffs, against the Interstate Building & Loan Company and I. C. Enochs, as defendants. The parties Will'be designated as they appeared, in the &ial 'court.

Mr. I. C. Enochs, one of the defendants, at the time of the institution of the suit was a nonresident of the state of Oklahoma, and the plaintiffs attempted to obtain service on him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harn v. Interstate Bldg. & L. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Vincent v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Levin Bros. v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Acme Harvesting Machine Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API