Legal Opinion

Woods v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1952No. 34343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The parties herein occupy the same relative position as in the trial court and hereafter they will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.

The defendant, Ad V. Woods, a minor nineteen years old, was charged in the county court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, on a charge of bastardy and tried and found guilty. From the judgment of the county court adjudging the defendant to be the father of the expected child and ordering him to pay the sum of $25 per month for the child’s support, defendant appeals.

Twelve specifications of error are made by the defendant, which he presents and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. McCloy & Trotter v. ArnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton by and Through Hamilton v. VadenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Gomes v. HameedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Thompson v. Rosehill Burial ParkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Gomes v. HameedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API