Worthen v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Justice.
This action involves a challenge to the constitutionality of House Bill 789 enacted by the Second Regular Session of the Forty-First Legislature of the State of Idaho in 1972.1 House Bill 789 is a revenue act which makes substantial changes in the tax liability of Idaho taxpayers.
The plaintiffs-appellants, Paul W. Worthen, et al., commenced this action alleging that House Bill 789 is unconstitutional. The defendants-respondents, State of Idaho and Idaho State Tax Commission, filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court entered findings of fact, conclusions of law, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Rainey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Cenarrusa v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Podolan v. Idaho Legal Aid Services, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.