Legal Opinion
Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence Denney
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 2015No. 43169PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
THE PREVIOUS OPINION ISSUED SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.
BURDICK, Justice.
This case comes before this Court pursuant to a Writ of Mandamus. The Coeur d’Alene Tribe (Tribe) petitioned the Court for a Writ of Mandamus compelling the Secretary of State to certify Senate Bill 1011 (S.B. 1011) as law. The Tribe alleges that the Governor did not return his veto for S.B. 1011 within the five-day deadline under the Idaho Constitution. The Tribe argues that because the veto was untimely, the bill automatically became law and the Secretary of State had a non-discretionary…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Young v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Regan v. DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Employers Resource Management Co. v. RonkIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Ybarra v. Legislature of the State of Idaho & ID Bd of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.