Legal Opinion

Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 29, 1916No. 331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Minerals Separation, Limited, against the Miami Copper Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

The bill in this suit was brought by the Minerals Separation, Limited, a corporation of Great Britain, against the Miami Copper Company, a corporation of Delaware, charging infringement of three United States process patents relating to ore concentration, owned by the plaintiff, namely, No. 835,120, of November 6, 1906, to H. F. Sulman, H. F. Kirkpatrick-Picard and J. Ballot, No. 962,678, of June 28, 1910, to H. L. Sulman, H. H. Greenway and A. H. Higgins, and No. 1,099,699, of June 9, 1914, to H. PI. Greenway, assignor to the plaintiff.

Under the processes shown in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. Moore Filter Co. v. Tonopah-Belmont Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miami Copper Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  2. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
  3. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
  4. Wolf Mineral Process Corp. v. Mineral Separation North American Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1925
  5. Minerals Separation North American Corp. v. Magma Copper Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API