Legal Opinion

Schnelle v. McClure

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1958No. 38170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was initiated by the plaintiffs in error upon a petition in which they alleged that in 1934 they were the owners of certain specifically described property; that “said plaintiffs executed to the defendant herein a warranty deed, a copy of which is hereto attached, marked Exhibit ‘A’, to the land above described”; that they are the owners of one-half of the minerals to which the defendant is making some claim, the exact nature of which is unknown. The deed attached to the petition is a general warranty deed which, in the granting clause as a separate paragraph following the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Cutright v. RicheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Hostutler v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Ford v. RaabSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Norman v. Aetna Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Crosswhite v. McCullyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API