State v. Ainsworth
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Deborah Mae Ainsworth’s Appeal
I. Motion to dismiss
Defendant Deborah Ainsworth first argues that the trial court erred by denying her motion to dismiss the charges of first degree rape and indecent liberties. We disagree.
In considering this motion, the trial court was required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from it. If there was substantial evidence — whether direct, circumstantial, or both —to support a finding that the offense charged was committed and that defendant committed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- C.G. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- State v. RundleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- C.G. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.