Legal Opinion

State v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1987No. 174A87PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant first contends there was not sufficient evidence to convict him of either first degree rape or taking indecent liberties with a minor. We deal first with the charge of first degree rape. N.C.G.S. § 14-27.2 provides in part:(a) A person is guilty of rape in the first degree if the person engages in vaginal intercourse:(1) With a victim who is a child under the age of 13 years and the defendant is at least 12 years old and is at least four years older than the victim; or

A person may be guilty of first degree rape if (1) he has vaginal intercourse with a child under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. United States v. Bailey MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. State v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. QuargSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API