Legal Opinion
Hasan v. McDonald's Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1985No. C1-85-1287PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant, Maureen Hasan, sued respondents for negligence. Respondents, McDonald’s Corporation, Chadco Corporation, and Jay Chadema (collectively referred to as “McDonald’s”), moved for summary judgment. Appellant then moved to compel answers to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. About two weeks previously, appellant had served interrogatories. Much discovery had taken place before these interrogatories were served. The trial court granted respondents’ summary judgment motion and declared the motion to compel discovery moot. Hasan appeals from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golba v. Kohl's Dept. Store, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hager v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Rudnitski v. SeelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re ThulinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.