Legal Opinion
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Bell
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 16, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00447Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00447-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 BELL, (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendant. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 18 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is 19 currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) 20 I. Screening Requirement and Standard 21 The…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.