Legal Opinion

Aycock v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 5, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.

Four suits, separately brought by four different plaintiffs against the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company, were, by consent, tried together before a jury in the circuit court' of Marion county, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in each of the four cases. From judgments on these verdicts the Railway Company prayed an appeal to this court, which was granted by the trial court, and the record recites that “L. R. Darr and S. P. Raulston acknowledged themselves surety on the defendant’s appeal bond, and the defendant is allowed thirty days in which to prepare…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. CampagnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Anderson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Burke v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Gossett v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Irvin v. City of ClarksvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  3. McKinnon v. MichaudCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  5. Miller v. Alman Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API