Legal Opinion

Irvin v. City of Clarksville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 7, 1988PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOCH, Judge.

This appeal involves a city’s demolition of a fire-damaged house. An owner of an interest in the property filed a pro se action in the Law and Equity Court for Montgomery County seeking compensatory and punitive damages. The trial court heard the matter without a jury and entered a judgment for the city at the close of the plaintiff’s proof. The property owner has appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

Robert Irvin and his mother, Louise Irvin, are “legal co-owners” of a house on Ninth Street in Clarksville. After the house was seriously damaged by fire, they…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burgs v. SisselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. James J. Dozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Donald Lee Childs v. Jack Duckworth, Sally Wenzel, and Robert BronnenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Young v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Kaylor v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Hodges v. Tennessee Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Paehler v. Union Planters National Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API