Legal Opinion
Sarullo v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 2003No. 01-4203PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Patrick Sarullo, a former employee of the United States Postal Service, was arrested for dealing drugs at work and was subsequently discharged. Sarullo, denying the charge, brought a Bivens action for malicious prosecution arising out of the arrest and also a claim against the Postal Service under Title VII for discrimination based on age and national origin and retaliation for a previous EEO claim. The District Court granted summary judgment for the Postal Service, holding (1) that Sarullo’s allegations could not defeat the individual defendants’ qualified immunity with…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- Howard v. Blalock Electric Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hodson v. Alpine Manor, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Dexter Dodd v. Patrick R. DonahoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Wesley v. Palace Rehabilitation & Care Center, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Jackson v. Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.