The Florida Bar v. Peter M. MacNamara
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The Florida Bar seeks review of the referee’s report recommending that Peter *167M. MacNamara be found guilty of certain acts of professional misconduct and not others and recommending that MacNa-mara be placed on disciplinary probation for two years with specified conditions.1 We approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt. We disapprove the referee’s recommended sanction that did not include a period of suspension and imposed only probation with conditions. Instead, we impose a ninety-day suspension in addition to the two-year probationary period with specified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen SchwartzSupreme Court of Florida · 2022
- The Florida Bar v. Michael Christopher GriecoSupreme Court of Florida · 2024