Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Peter M. MacNamara

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 2014No. SC11-1029Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-1029 ____________ THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. PETER M. MACNAMARA, Respondent. [December 19, 2013] CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar seeks review of the referee’s report recommending that Peter M. MacNamara be found guilty of certain acts of professional misconduct and not others and recommending that MacNamara be placed on disciplinary probation for two years with specified conditions. 1 We approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt. We disapprove the referee’s recommended sanction that did not include a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API