Hobson v. New Mexico & Arizona Railroad
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
Before entering into the merits of this case it is necessary to dispose of some preliminary questions.. The defendant appeared specially, and moved to set aside the service of summons because not made npon the “president, or other head of the corporation, secretary, cashier, or managing agent thereof, or to any lawful agent appointed for that purpose, or any director or stockholder, as required by our statute.” The return showed service upon J. H. Scott, agent *175of defendant. The affidavit of E. B. Pomeroy, the duly-appointed, acting, and lawful agent, stated that said Scott was not the agent.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ruby v. United Sugar Companies, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Younie v. Blackfoot Light & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Ideal Cream Separator Repair Works v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Christensen Ex Rel. Christensen v. BoucherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Horne v. BlakelyArizona Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.