Legal Opinion

Ignotov v. Reiter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1986No. 73095, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The issue presented in this legal malpractice action is whether the trial judge clearly erred in finding that a lawyer’s negligence was a cause of the termination of his client’s parental rights. We conclude that the judge did not err, and would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals which set aside a money judgment in favor of the client.

i

Samuel S. Reiter was retained by Daniel T. Ignotov to represent Ignotov in proceedings concerning his daughter, Dana Sue. These proceedings were initiated by Ignotov’s ex-wife, Janice Everest, as the first step in having Dana Sue adopted by Janice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Glidden v. TerranovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Winter v. Brown Ex Rel. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Romanian American Interests, Inc. v. ScherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Ignotov v. ReiterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. GurwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Pontiac School District v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & StoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API