Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Farwell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1918No. 12216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. William L. Pond, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

This appeal is from a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming a special assessment of $177,059.28 against the property of the Chicago Dock and Canal Company for the improvement of a thoroughfare from the north curb line of East Randolph street to the center line of East Chicago avenue. The only questions argued are those which concern the amount of benefit to the property, the appellant insisting that none of its property will receive any benefit from the improvement and that the court erred in its rulings on the admission of evidence and on findings of facts and propositions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geohegan v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hohmann v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Kankakee v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. ConnorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. City of Batavia v. WileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re Assessment of Benefits From Changing Grade, Paving & Improving Robert & Other StreetsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Village of Northbrook v. SteerupIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API