Legal Opinion

Hohmann v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1892PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was an action on the case, brought by Charles Hohmann against the city of Chicago, to recover damages to the plaintiff’s leasehold interest in premises situated on the northeast corner of North Western Avenue and Fulton street, Chicago, and to the business carried on by him on said premises, caused by the erection on said North Western Avenue of a viaduct over Kinzie street. Fulton street, as it seems, is a street running east and west, and is the street parallel to and next south of Kinzie street, both of said streets being- crossed at right angles by North Western Avenue. Most of…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burgess v. M/V TamanoDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1973
  2. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. American Const. Co. v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Wilson & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Chicago v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API