Legal Opinion
Fox v. Maulding
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1994No. 92-5186PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order of August 18, 1992, dismissing their action with prejudice after declining to exercise jurisdiction over the case pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976).1 Plaintiffs challenge the district court’s decision on procedural grounds, as well as on the merits. We reverse and remand for further consideration.
The Colorado River doctrine applies to “situations involving the contemporaneous exercise of concurrent jurisdictions ... by state and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Villa Marina Yacht Sales, Inc. v. Hatteras YachtsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Carlton Allen v. Board Of Education, Unified School District 436Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Fox v. MauldingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Klein v. University of Kansas Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Marcus v. Township of AbingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.