Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Boyle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

Plaintiff herein, as vendee, seeks to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate from the defendant, and to recover the money paid thereunder. Defendant by cross-bill prays for specific performance of the contract. Plaintiffs bill was dismissed and a decree entered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The contract was entered into on August 2, 1920. Its terms are not in dispute. Plaintiff made the interest payments due thereon and paid the taxes until April 10, 1925, when he served notice of rescission and made demand for all moneys paid by him, including the down payment. The contract…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Security Insurance v. FayMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Edwards v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Langley v. KirkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bechard v. BoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Fitchner v. WallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Larkin v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Struble v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API