Legal Opinion

Amster v. Stratton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 119, Calendar No. 36,429PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Nathan Amster and his wife, the former herein called plaintiff, filed this bill to foreclose a land contract between himself as vendor and defendants as vendees; also to foreclose a chattel mortgage which defendants gave plaintiff to secure certain instalments which accrued under the land contract but were not paid. Defendants by cross-bill sought-cancellation on the ground they had been defrauded by plaintiff incident to the purchase. A decree was entered for plaintiff, and defendants have appealed.

In the latter part of Angnst, 1927, the defendants purchased from plaintiff on a contract 120’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merrill v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Windisch v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Papciak v. MorawskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Vernon v. AntonaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Bechard v. BoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Schnitz v. Grand River Avenue Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bonninghausen v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Capitol Savings & Loan Co. v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API