Legal Opinion

D'Arrigo Bros. v. United Farmworkers of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 2014No. H038213PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, Acting P. J.

D’Arrigo Bros, of California (D’Arrigo) filed this action for breach of contract against the United Farmworkers of America (UFW), which was representing D’Arrigo’s agricultural workers. UFW moved to strike D’Arrigo’s complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16), but the superior court denied the motion. UFW seeks review, contending that the action arose from its protected petitioning activity and that D’Arrigo cannot show a probability of prevailing in the action. We find merit in UFW’s position and therefore must…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Yaroslav Lozovyy v. Richard KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. American Ice Machine Company v. Modern Ice Equipment Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Greentree Hospitality Group Incorporated v. MullinixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Intent Brands, Inc. v. CalNutri, Inc., Common Collabs, LLC, and Wildpack Beverage, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Intent Brands, Inc. v. Calnutri, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API