Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Nigro

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1916No. S. F. No. 7549. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William P. Hubbard, for Appellants Charles 0. Butler et al. Knight & Heggerty, and William M. Madden, for Appellant Bose Croghan Johnson. Harry F. Sullivan, and Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Boche, for Bespondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Two appeals are here presented, each involving the determination of the right of inheritance, under section 1386 of the Civil Code, to certain portions of the estate of Ellen Nigro, deceased, not disposed of by her will. The appeals, respectively, are from parts of the decree of distribution of said estate.

Ellen Nigro, left surviving at her death neither issue, husband, father, mother, brother nor sister. She was the survivor of a family of four children, consisting of herself, Ann Butler, Margaret Gordon, and Michael Croghan.

At the time of her death the following descendants of her sisters…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Estate of LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Dickey v. WalrondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Maud v. CatherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Estate of WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Broward v. BrowardSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API