In Re Estate of Nigro
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of Alameda County making partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. P. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Samuel M. Shortridge, and Walter H. Linforth, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a decree of partial distribution. The deceased died intestate, leaving surviving him a widow, no father, no mother, no brother, no sister, but nieces and nephews. The nieces and nephews appeal, and the motion to dismiss is based upon the ground that, having no interest in the estate, they are not parties in interest so as to be entitled to appeal. It is conceded by the attorneys for the appellant that, if this court adheres to its decisions in Estate of Ingram, 78 Cal. 586, [12 Am. St. Rep. 80, 21 Pac. 435], and Estate of Carmody, 88 Cal. 616, [26…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of CarmodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of BelshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re Estate of BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.