Legal Opinion

Estate of Lynch

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1901No. Sac. No. 816PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Solano County distributing the estate of a deceased person. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

—The estate of P. C*. Lynch, an intestate, was distributed,—to the widow, Mary Lynch, appellant here, fifteen twentieths as survivor of the community, and statutory heir at law, and the remaining five twentieths to certain collateral distributees,—to wit, two brothers and one sister, all of the half blood, and to two sets of children, being the children of a deceased brother of the full blood, and the children of a deceased sister of the full blood. The question is, Are these collaterals entitled to take any part of the estate, as against the widow, who claims it all?

Appellant rests…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Rowley v. StrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Pearson v. GriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  5. Clark v. SpragueIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. People v. ElliffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Estate of PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API