Legal Opinion

Anderson v. O'BRIEN

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1974No. 42818PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

— Petitioners, members of the Economic Assistance Authority, seek a writ of mandamus to compel respondent O’Brien, as state treasurer, to sign a warrant issued by that authority to the Kalispel Indian Community. The treasurer, acting on advice of the Attorney General, refused to sign the warrant because of statutory and constitutional questions raised by the proposed disbursement.

The broad question presented by this original proceeding in the Supreme Court is whether, consistent with the Economic Assistance Act of 1972 (RCW 43.31A) and the Washington State Constitution, state funds may be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bannon v. Port of Palm Beach DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bradley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API