Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar and Ruan Junior Hamilton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2013No. CR-12-0462-PRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 In a “reverse-sting” operation, undercover law enforcement officers sell drugs or other contraband to unsuspecting purchasers. The issue here is whether purchasers who handle and pay for drugs in a reverse sting, but do not and would not have been allowed to take them away, can be said to “possess” drugs for sale. Contrary to the purchasers’ argument, we conclude that it is possible to commit the offense of possessing drugs for sale under these circumstances.

I

¶2 An undercover detective arranged to sell a large quantity of marijuana to defendants Ruan Hamilton and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Isiah KitchenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CheramieArizona Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API