Legal Opinion

State v. Chairez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 17, 2013No. 2 CA-CR 2013-0115-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Pedro Chairez was convicted pursuant to a plea agreement of two counts of participating in a street gang. He sought post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., claiming in his pro se petition that, inter alia, the plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent and there was an insufficient factual basis for the plea. The trial court dismissed the petition summarily and denied his motion for rehearing. Chai-rez challenges the trial court’s rulings in the petition for review now before us. We will not disturb the rulings,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. DjerfArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Stair v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API