Legal Opinion

Maffeo v. Holmes

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1941No. Civ. 13007PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment after verdict against her in this action for damages on account of the alleged wrongful death of her minor child, Teddy. Motion for a new trial seasonably made was denied by the expiration of 60 days from the date of filing of the notice of intention to make the motion. The ground specifically relied upon for the new trial was the conduct of certain jurors in visiting the scene of the accident and reporting their observations to the jury during deliberations.

Teddy had visited the public library at Crenshaw and 66th -Street just before the accident. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. WeatherfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Kerby v. HiestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API