Legal Opinion

Bicknell v. Lloyd-Smith

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1938No. 7688PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek judgment for a sum of money against the defendant under her written guarantee of the payment of corporate bonds issued by the Sugar Pine Lumber Company.

The complaint was verified and presumably filed on the 8th day of August, 1938, prior to the effective date of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

On November 28, 1938, a notice of motion was filed the hearing of which was adjourned to December 14th, in which the defendant sought;

I. An order requiring the plaintiffs to furnish a more…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. Adams Express Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  2. Patterson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
  4. Newbold v. FloranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Baim & Blank v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API