Gimbel Bros. v. Adams Express Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
At Law. Action by Gimbel Bros., Incorporated, against the Adams Express Company. On rule for more specific statement.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
[1,2] At the argument of this case at bar the offer was made by the plaintiff to join with the defendant in the work of making a comparison of the records of all shipments involved in the present contention, with a view to reach an agreement upon the uncontested facts. If this is done, the defendant will have all the information which could be given by the fullest and most elaborate bill of particulars which could possibly be filed in the case, and the anticipated labors of the court and of the jury be very much curtailed at the trial. The present rule has, in the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Alaska S. S. Co. v. KatzeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Bodine v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1922
- Bicknell v. Lloyd-SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Beacon Folding Mach. Co. v. Rotary Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.