Legal Opinion
Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 1, 1938No. 3PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
Hearing on amended motion by defendants for bill of particulars under Rule 12 (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The following are typical of the particulars requested:
“1. With respect to the allegations of numbered paragraph 5 of the bill of complaint, that plaintiff shall:
“(a) In the case of each claim of letters patent No. 1,830,131, specify precisely what plaintiff deems to be new and patentable in such claim;
“(b) In the case of each claim of letters patent No. 1,830,131, containing the term ‘caustic alkali solution of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Rhodes-Hochriem Mfg. Co. v. International Ticket Scale Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932
- Stanley Co. of America, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
- United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.