Legal Opinion
Woodhams v. Moore
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 11, 1994No. C-1-92-121PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Prejudgment Interest (doc. 21), the Defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 25), and Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 26).
A hearing on the Defendant’s Motion was held on October 7, 1993. In rendering our decision of this matter, we have considered the documents admitted into evidence, the Plaintiffs proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (doc. 33), and the Defendant’s proposed findings of fact and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- John C. Shimman, Cross-Appellant v. John Frank, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Digital & Analog Design Corp. v. North Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Pierson v. HermannOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- Phoenix Phase I Associates v. Ginsberg, Guren & MerrittOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loder v. BurgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Krieger v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- King v. NiswongerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014