Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Hermann

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1965No. 7986PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTroop, J.

Plaintiff in the trial court, Ralph Pierson, appellant here, received a judgment against the defendant in the trial court, Earl M. Hermann, and then filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled. This appeal hy the plaintiff is from that judgment and final order. The judgment is predicated upon the verdict of a jury.

The cause of action arose out of an automobile accident, the plaintiff claiming property damage, personal injury, and aggravation of an existing injury as a result of the negligence of the defendant. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $142 for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Golamb v. LaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hall v. BurkertOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. McAllister v. SouleOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Brannon v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Miller v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RicklickArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cusumano v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Meyer v. RicklickArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Roberts v. Mutual Manufacturing & Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API